Re: Requirements for releasing the STK toolbox as an Octave forge package ?

[Julien Bect]

On 24/02/2014 20:52, c. wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2014, at 17:20, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > > As a user, I prefer when I can browse the source tree and understand from
> > > its structure how the toolbox/package/module/... is organized. So, yes, I
> > > know that I could put everything into a single directory, but I would really
> > > prefer to keep the original layout if possible (I see that the LTFAT package
> > > has subdirectories, for instance, so it shouldn't be a problem).
> > >
> > > Plus, the packaging script would be more delicate to write, since not
> > > everything must be flattened out (for instance, we have private
> > > subdirectories, class subdirectories, and even class subdirectories that
> > > contain private subdirectories that contain MEX-files...).
> > >
> > > Of course, if it turns out that this is the only to make it work, I will do
> > > that.
> No, you don't need to change the way you organize your code to have a flat
> directory structure, other packages are organized into subdirectories and
> you cand copy the way it is done for example from the package "ocs":
>
> http://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/octave-forge/extra/ocs/PKG_ADD

In fact, I *already* have PKG_ADD/PKG_DEL scripts for that, and they 
work fine. Thanks for the link anyway :)