[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions
From: |
Julien Bect |
Subject: |
Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:29:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Le 17/06/2014 02:39, Rik a écrit :
I find that this changeset:
12920:5d18231eee00 Extend profiling support to operators.
produces a 50% slow down when using the for loop benchmark. Unless we
can figure out a lower footprint way to do profiling we might be stuck
with this part of the slowdown.
The attached patch significantly improves the situation for me.
On the gui-release branch, the runtime goes from 2.75 seconds to 2.16
seconds.
Not a 50% improvement, though...
@++
Julien
SpeedupInactiveProfiler.patch
Description: Text Data
- For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Rik, 2014/06/06
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Rik, 2014/06/16
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, ijourneaux, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions,
Julien Bect <=
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, John W. Eaton, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, John W. Eaton, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/17
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/22
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Julien Bect, 2014/06/23
- Re: For loop benchmarks between Octave versions, Daniel J Sebald, 2014/06/23