Re: GSOC 16, Improvements to sqrtm,logm and funm

[Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso]

On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 12:40 +0530, Mudit Sharma wrote:
> >For example, how much more work is there before the `mft_test` command
> >available here passes on Octave? How about making it pass with speed
> >comparable to Matlab?
> 
> Does this mean writing the mft toolbox scripts as C codes?
> Since speed is achieved easily by it.

Well, it would be C++, not C, since we don't generally do C. But
regardless, does it already work at all with Octave code? I tried for
a few minutes with what I could find and it didn't work. Did you make
it work?

- Jordi G. H.