[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: terminals_with_size
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: terminals_with_size |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:59:34 +0900 (JST) |
----- Original Message -----
>From: Dmitri A. Sergatskov
>Those are terminal used by "print" (and related) command. qt is interractive
>terminal
>
>It does have "size" and "position", but I do not think it is relevant. The
>same can be said about
>
>e.g. x11 terminal.
>
>Mike wrote:
>
> figure ("position", [0, 0, 1000, 200])
>
> works when using GNUTERM=x11, but not when GNUTERM=qt. This may have
> something to do with that.
I cannot see the "position" property for figure in octave manual.
From the viewing codes and some experiments, I found that
The "position" property value are [x_position, y_position, x_size, y_size]
Unit of values are pixels.
Then even for interactive terminal,
terminals_with_size has important meaning for specifying figure size.
Therefore octave-4.2.0-rc1 (before attaching patch.)
figure("position", [0, 0, 500, 500])
command effective for size for wxt terminal but not effective qt terminal.
Tatsuro
- Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Rik, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Mike Miller, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, John W. Eaton, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Rik, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Rik, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Mike Miller, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Rik, 2016/09/15
- Re: terminals_with_size, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
- Re: terminals_with_size, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/15
- Re: terminals_with_size, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Ben Abbott, 2016/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: terminals_with_size, Rik, 2016/09/14