[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Implementing categorial function
|
From: |
Mike Miller |
|
Subject: |
Re: Implementing categorial function |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:50:22 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20161104 (1.7.1) |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 22:57:27 -0800, NVS Abhilash wrote:
> So I guess start implementing these.
> Also I guess first step would be to actually implement the data type and the
> functions associated with it. Then we should look for compatibility with
> other functions?
Yes I think starting with the constructor and deciding how the data type
will be stored and represented is a pretty good starting point.
--
mike
- Implementing categorial function, NVS Abhilash, 2016/11/20
- Re: Implementing categorial function, Mike Miller, 2016/11/20
- Re: Implementing categorial function, NVS Abhilash, 2016/11/22
- Re: Implementing categorial function,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: Implementing categorial function, NVS Abhilash, 2016/11/23
- Re: Implementing categorial function, Mike Miller, 2016/11/23
- Re: Implementing categorial function, NVS Abhilash, 2016/11/26
- Re: Implementing categorial function, Mike Miller, 2016/11/26