Re: [Om-synth] It's alive!

[Atte André Jensen]

Dave Robillard wrote:
Thanks for the explanations, it makes sense.

> Atte André Jensen wrote:

> > Would you like the bug reports start comming?

> Yes, absolutely!  The engine in CVS right now is waay more stable then 
> the released version, but I would still definitely like bug reports.  
> Making Om bulletproof is a very high priority right now.  You can 
> report things either here on the list or the savannah bugs page.  
> Having it on the bugs page will probably better assure that I'll get 
> around to it eventually ;)

Ok, I'll grap the cvs, and start reporting the bugs I come across...

> > 5) I also have a few suggestions, but maybe after some smoke has 
> cleared?

Actually I was thinking about the bugs that I haven't reported yet :-)

Let me grap cvs, that should supposedly be more stable, right?

> I'm happy to have some people with a completely end-user perspective, 
> to help me sort out these usability issues.  I've just recently gotten 
> Om to the point where it's relatively solid on the technological level, 
> so now it's time to make it as easy to use as possible, and /stable/.

Great. As soon as cvs is up and running here, I'll share my suggestions.

> And, well... yes... the whole documentation thing.... a little 
> assistance in that area would be quite nice, I have to say. :)

Right now I'm basically trying out om. But if/when I actually start 
using om on a regular basis as an integral part of my setup, I'd like to 
help with the docs.

--
  .''`.  Peace, love & harmony
 : :' :  Atte
 `. `'
   `-    http://www.atte.dk