Re: [Om-synth] "note allocation scheme" with polyphony = 1

[Atte André Jensen]

Dave Robillard wrote:

> I don't know about the four different ways.. that would require a
> control port to select which method is used, but there's no real way
> of having enumerations so you can tell which method you're actually
> using (it'd just be some meaningless number).

Can't you put names to vaues in om internal modules?

> I suppose I could make it voodoo, ie a 'configuration' thing, not part
> of a node.  I guess a configuration system of some variety is due one
> of these days, come to think of it.

It would make sense, anyways, right?

> Anyway, /for the time being/, I'll just fix it to be latest note
> (which I think is best),

That would be the best, agreed

> or maybe a slightly more clever tweak thereof (ie never steal the
> lowest note, which is always a good trick).

That's not so good. It would be the same as higest nte priority...

> I'll take a look into all the voice allocation stuff as soon as I get
> back to my computer and can actually run Om.


Great, great, great...

--
  .''`.  Peace, love & harmony
 : :' :  Atte
 `. `'
   `-    http://www.atte.dk