Re: [Pan-users] Spellchecking

[Duncan]

On Wed 26 Mar 2003 19:35, Torstein Sunde posted as excerpted below:
> BTW, instead of bundling the source code, could linking gtkspell
> statically be an option?  That contradicts some of my concerns, but at
> least it makes it easier to apply recent bugfixes in gtkspell, as long
> as the packager makes sure he's using the latest release.

I'm thinking Charles meant essentially static linking, but possibly with code 
borrowed directly, rather than as a static library.  With that being the 
case, it would be simply another source code file in the CVS, and the 
dictionary selection functionality of directly calling aspell could be either 
added directly to it, or kept separate for ease of porting new gtkspell libs 
over when necessary.

Surely, it would at minimum be static linked such that binary installs would 
still only have the PAN binary to worry about, instead of another one as 
well.

-- 
Duncan
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin