[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] RE: Re: Wish: don't start a new instance of pan.
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] RE: Re: Wish: don't start a new instance of pan. |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Oct 2003 05:29:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) |
Lenroc posted <address@hidden>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 02 Oct 2003 01:56:00 -0700:
> On Thu, 02 Oct 2003 07:58:45 +0100, Toby A Inkster wrote:
>> If someone else has SSHd into my box and is running Pan on a remote X
>> server, I don't want to be prevented from running Pan.
>
> It's not really a good idea to be running two instances of Pan in any
> case, is it?
>
> Couldn't that cause conflicts with the data files, etc.?
Not if they are different users, since the data files are kept under
~/.pan, which would be different for each user (under the native *ix,
anyway, no idea how it's done on MSWormOS).
OTOH, PAN is already rather slow and resource hungry when it comes to
dealing with multiple-hundred-thousand post groups. The possibility
of having TWO separate instances churning away on such groups.. <shudder>
Of course, my ~/.pan is a symlink to a separate, dedicated partition. If
both attempted to use the same base path on the same dedicated partition..
but that'd always be a problem, even if both weren't running together, and
it could as easily be solved with either separate dedicated partitions, or
different paths on the same partition. Thus, no unusual problem there.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
Benjamin Franklin
[Pan-users] Re: Wish: don't start a new instance of pan., Duncan, 2003/10/01