[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: Re: Headers..
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: Re: Headers.. |
Date: |
Sun, 28 May 2006 14:21:08 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
pan 0.98 ("The plain old chaos of undifferentiated weirdness.") |
Brad Rogers <address@hidden> posted
address@hidden, excerpted below, on Sun, 28 May 2006
09:41:45 +0100:
> On Sat, 27 May 2006 21:53:05 +0000 (UTC) "Duncan"
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hello Duncan,
>
>> hide the ordinary ones I did NOT want to see, while seeing any others
>> incl. custom headers that folks might include.
>
> I always include an X-Offender header. Does that help? :-)
Interesting, that. Why? Well, when I collected the mail last night,
there was one of those state "Sex Offender Notification" things in the
mail.
(se)x-offender?
(In this case, he's considered a medium risk, the threshhold for the
mandatory notification. Seems a few years ago he got caught in a
consensual relationship with a 14-year-old, who considered him her
boyfriend. He was 22 at the time, going by the date and his age now.
22-14 consensual? IMO, that makes him the victim -- of the state.
<shrug>)
Anyway, yeah, that's the sort of custom header I'm interested in seeing,
just like I'm interested in seeing what sorts of T-shirts people wear.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- [Pan-users] Headers.., Chris Maaskant, 2006/05/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Headers.., Chris Maaskant, 2006/05/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Headers.., walt, 2006/05/27
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Headers.., Brad Rogers, 2006/05/28
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Headers..,
Duncan <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Headers.., Brad Rogers, 2006/05/28
- RE: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Headers.., Travis, 2006/05/28
- [Pan-users] Re: RE: Re: Re: Headers.., Duncan, 2006/05/29
- RE: [Pan-users] Re: RE: Re: Re: Headers.., Travis, 2006/05/29
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Headers.., Chris Maaskant, 2006/05/28