pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Pan-users] Upgrade to Natty Narwhall, still problems


From: Orlok Nosferatu
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Upgrade to Natty Narwhall, still problems
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:07:26 +0000

Aww. When I checked Pan I saw it still had the 0.133 version. So I started to 
upgrade by downloading and extracting the pan-0.123 package. When I executed 
./configure I saw I had some missing packages, so I downloaded, extracted and 
ran the ./configure's of glib-2.24.1 and gmime-2.4.23 too. Checking the 
config.log's I saw "configure: exit 0" at the end of each (glib, gmime and pan) 
log file. So that should be good, shouldn't it? Why does my pan still say it is 
version 0.133 (when I look in the help menu followed by an 'about' menu 
choice)? A 'pan --version' gave me the same answer (eg 'Pan 0.133').


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Duncan
> Sent: 05/09/11 10:49 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Upgrade to Natty Narwhall, still problems
> 
> Orlok Nosferatu posted on Mon, 09 May 2011 06:32:51 +0000 as excerpted:
> 
> > So what options do I have? 
> 
> You've stumped me! <shrug>
> 
> > And where can I create a new bug for Pan?
> 
> First, verify that you're using the pan that Ubuntu ships now, and that 
> it's version 0.134. If not... file a bug with Ubuntu!
> 
> If you're using the shipped version and it's 0.134, then file an upstream 
> bug. Here's where many of them are dealt with, but yours appears to be 
> something that's going to require more work to trace and time to fix, so 
> definitely file it in the bug-tracker as well.
> 
> AFAIK, pan's feedback or bug report (under the help menu) still takes you 
> to the right place, gnome's bug tracker, with some fields already 
> helpfully filled in. That's if you already have a gnome bugzilla account 
> and the proper unexpired cookies, otherwise you get a login prompt first, 
> and may have to setup an account if necessary and login first, then try 
> again to do it with the cookies in-place, to get the advantage of the pre-
> filled fields.
> 
> In the PKovar/KHaley team, PKovar is handling the gnome side of things. I 
> don't know if KHaley has more than user bug privs there or not. But 
> regardless, they still go to gnome's bugzilla, there's been no changes to 
> that, as far as I know.
> 
> -- 
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pan-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]