Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139

[poub281104-pan]

--- En date de : Lun 1.10.12, Heinrich Müller <address@hidden> a écrit :

> De: Heinrich Müller <address@hidden>
> Objet: Re: [Pan-users] article-cache v 0.139
> À: address@hidden
> Date: Lundi 1 octobre 2012, 7h20
> Am 30.09.2012 23:54, schrieb Duncan:
> > Heinrich Müller posted on Sun, 30 Sep 2012 21:38:30
> +0200 as excerpted:
> >
> >> Am 30.09.2012 20:01, schrieb
> >> address@hidden:
> >>> So what can I deduce ? Some usenet providers
> are faulty (2) or problems
> >>> with permissions (1) or both ?
> >> Case 2.
> >> Usenetbucket fucked up big time and doesn't respect
> the rfc that defines
> >> the XOVER command.
> >> See my commit for details.
> >> Should be working now, please verify.
> > Umm, Heinrich...
> >
> > He's using ubuntu and unless he knows enough (or has
> the time and
> > patience to learn) about building from source to pull
> and build from the
> > git repo, he's not likely to see that commit until the
> next pan release
> > and someone building it for ubuntu.
> I guess I'll have to ping Klaus Vormweg so he builds it once
> more.
> >
> > Meanwhile, I'm curious and will be checking the commit
> myself.  (For
> > those who don't know, gentoo, with a slightly
> customized live pan ebuild
> > and a helper script I hacked up that allows me to
> easily run various git
> > commands on the local git repo the ebuild uses.)
> >
> You're right, i should have said "if you are able to".
> I tend to see things from a programmer's pov.
> You can register at usenetbucket for free for a 6-day trial,
> that's what 
> I did.
> After my hack I was able to download properly. Seems like
> the implementation
> on their servers is faulty. I already wrote an e-mail to
> their support.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
I have read the doc about git and it looks difficult. Is it possible to put a 
version of your hacked pan so I can check if it works for ubuntu 12.04 X64 ?