Re: [Phpgroupware-developers] jscalendar

[Dan Kuykendall]

Lars Kneschke wrote:

> address@hidden schrieb: 
>  
>
> > hey,
> > we droped the jscalendar from our cvs tree again, maybe temporarily.
> > the
> > reason is they do not use the lgpl but changed the lgpl licensing
> > notice
> > by adding some aditional notice.
> >    
>
> We are moving in the wrong direction!
>
> Today it is more important for our project to have the right license then
> producing code. This is something that makes me really unhappy!!!
>  

LOL!
Are you kidding me? You know I like you man, but why dont we toss in 
some SCO code for good measure?
Its important to make sure the code is all licensed properly. The whole 
SCO lawsuit is a good example, that even if you think your OK, you could 
still get hassled, so why make your problems worse by actually violating 
our license structure?

> This something i can't understand! Why can't we simply contatct the
> developer of this class and tell him about the problem. If he changes the
> statement the class can stay, if not we need to remove the class.
>  
Till the developer re-licenses we need to remove it

> I know that it is important to have a look at the license(see SCO against
> IBM/Linux/GPL), but the way our leaders(wo are the project leaders
> currently????) are doing, shows no respect for the work of other people.
>  
How does it show no respect?
Lets quickly recap
developer 1 tosses in some JS code with bad license into the API before 
telling anyone.
developer  2 sees the mess, and yanks it out and explains why.

Why is that disrespectful?

> I'm i the only one who feels like this?
>  
maybe, because I completely disagree with you on this.