[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat
From: |
Remon Sijrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 22:04:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
Hi,
I lost some of the mails send last week, but if I understand well, you
(Martin) are doing some coding on the import functions?
Most of these files are later (if not all) scanned to make a peak file for
representation. If the import process should pas the data to
"Peak::process_samples_from_buffer" then we only have to read it once from
hard disk instead of twice. The import process will be slower, but the
overall import time will decrease.
I had this idea in mind for a long time allready, but it wasn't trivial to
code it with the current import code :-(
If you think this is something usefull you can maybe have it in mind while
working on this code.
Best wishes,
Remon
- [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Martin Herren, 2004/03/10
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Luciano Giordana, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Martin Herren, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Luciano Giordana, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Martin Herren, 2004/03/14
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat,
Remon Sijrier <=
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Luciano Giordana, 2004/03/15
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, rsff, 2004/03/16
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Luciano Giordana, 2004/03/16
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Martin Herren, 2004/03/16
- Re: [Protux-devel] Re: MustuxAudioFileFormat, Luciano Giordana, 2004/03/16