[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4
From: |
Stephen Torri |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4 |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:54:56 -0600 |
> As I said before, the x86 target is a hybrid of the new and old code. ie. if
> it didn't work before it probably won't work after. configure
> with --target-list=m68k-user and it should work fine with gcc4.
>
> Paul
I need a x86 instruction set simulator that can step-by-step execute
could and allow me access to the internals. This is why I have looked at
qemu because of a recommendation from a developer of Ptlsim. It was
suggested that qemu would be lighter weight for what I need. So what do
you suggest I use for a x86 instruction set simulator?
Stephen
--
PhD. Student
Auburn University
Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering
107 Dunstan Hall
Auburn, AL 36849-5347 U.S.A.
(334) 844-4330 (O)
address@hidden
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4,
Stephen Torri <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/30
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/22