[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for July 27

[Anthony Liguori]

On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Anthony Liguori<address@hidden>  writes:
>
>    
> > - any additional input on probed_raw?
> >      
> Isn't it a fait accompli?  I stopped providing input when commit
> 79368c81 appeared.
>    

No.  79368c81 was to close the security hole (and I do consider it a 
security hole).  But as I mentioned on the list, I'm also not satisfied 
with it and that's why I proposed probed_raw.  I was hoping to get a 
little more input from those that objected to 79368c81 as to whether 
probed_raw was more agreeable.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori