[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update
From: |
Taylor, ForrestX |
Subject: |
RE: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:27:50 -0800 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Moss [mailto:address@hidden
>
> > Before I started re-burning the discs, I decided to try a regular
> > (non-kickstart) install, choosing only a minimum of
> packages. I did the
> > custom install, and chose:
> >
> > X Window System (but not KDE or GNOME)
> > Network Support
> > Messaging and Web Tools
> > Utilities
> > Software Development
>
> I would be curious how a base install would do.
What is your definition of base install?
>
> Please post the image online somewhere.
Ok.
> This is an image with a modified anaconda, correct?
Yes
> Are the only mods to skip the check for low memory?
Well, no. I did add a patch to the boot.msg file (gives some kickstart
options and adds SmallMem to the title), and the syslinux.cfg file. I added
a patch so that kickstart could be used from the CD (loader.c), and a patch
to clean up splitdistro.
I posted the patch for the low-mem check earlier, but I can post it again if
you want to see it. I can also put up the anaconda source.
Forrest
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
> >
> > These were 978MB, and it took a little over an hour (until
> it died with 8
> > packages left). If you want, I can post my boot.img (or
> put it on the
> > web/ftp site), and everyone else can try it on their
> low-memory systems [or
> > use mem=16M at the boot prompt].
> >
> > Forrest
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marco Fioretti [mailto:address@hidden
> > >
> > > Forrest,
> > >
> > > any news on this?
> > >
> > > Ciao,
> > > Marco
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 09:34:15 at 09:34:15AM -0800, Taylor,
> > > ForrestX wrote:
> > > > Well, I am still waiting for the installer to complete.
> > > >
> > > > For those who haven't been following my work on the
> > > enigma-list (Red Hat), I
> > > > tried to simply change the code in anaconda allowing for
> > > 8000K RAM instead
> > > > of the default 17000K. I tried removing packages until it
> > > fit on one disc,
> > > > and used 'linux mem=16M'. The install took over three
> > > hours on a PIII
> > > > 500MHz [1153MB of total packages]. I tried the standard
> > > two-disc set, with
> > > > the modified anaconda, and I am awaiting the results.
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't look too promising, as it has been 20 hours, and
> > > it still hasn't
> > > > started installing packages. It now has the Processing
> > > [Preparing to
> > > > install...] screen, but the progress bar has not started.
> > > >
> > > > Once (if) this finishes, I will try one further test with
> > > this disc-set. I
> > > > want to select minimal packages [currently I have selected
> > > 1739 MB of total
> > > > packages], and see if that is any faster.
> > > >
> > > > I will keep you all updated.
> > > >
> > > > Forrest
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rule-list mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rule-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/rule-list
>
- [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Taylor, ForrestX, 2002/02/06
- RE: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Taylor, ForrestX, 2002/02/07
- RE: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update,
Taylor, ForrestX <=
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Chuck Moss, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Bill Crawford, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Martin Stricker, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Bill Crawford, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/09
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Chuck Moss, 2002/02/09
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/10
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/10