[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update
From: |
Chuck Moss |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:36:52 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:27:50PM -0800, Taylor, ForrestX wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chuck Moss [mailto:address@hidden
> >
> > > Before I started re-burning the discs, I decided to try a regular
> > > (non-kickstart) install, choosing only a minimum of
> > packages. I did the
> > > custom install, and chose:
> > >
> > > X Window System (but not KDE or GNOME)
> > > Network Support
> > > Messaging and Web Tools
> > > Utilities
> > > Software Development
> >
> > I would be curious how a base install would do.
>
> What is your definition of base install?
The base section in the comps file.
> > Are the only mods to skip the check for low memory?
>
> Well, no. I did add a patch to the boot.msg file (gives some kickstart
> options and adds SmallMem to the title), and the syslinux.cfg file. I added
> a patch so that kickstart could be used from the CD (loader.c), and a patch
> to clean up splitdistro.
>
> I posted the patch for the low-mem check earlier, but I can post it again if
> you want to see it. I can also put up the anaconda source.
Thanks for the info. If you posted the patch to enigma list i saved the
thread. If not it would be great if you could email me the patch directly.
(maybe to the list so it would be in the archive???)
Chuck
- [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Taylor, ForrestX, 2002/02/06
- RE: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Taylor, ForrestX, 2002/02/07
- RE: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Taylor, ForrestX, 2002/02/07
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update,
Chuck Moss <=
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Chuck Moss, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Bill Crawford, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Martin Stricker, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Bill Crawford, 2002/02/08
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/09
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Chuck Moss, 2002/02/09
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/10
- Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Marco Fioretti, 2002/02/10
Re: [Rule-list] Modifying the current anaconda--progress update, Pietro Abbati Marescotti, 2002/02/08