[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ping Packagers
From: |
Brian Kroth |
Subject: |
Re: Ping Packagers |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:14:43 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Dustin Kirkland <address@hidden> 2009-12-22 10:42:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I don't think there will be much of a problem using dynamic malloc in the
> > current code. However, it can be problematic for when we merge in the
> > scripting support. For example, a script could store the window pointers
> > somewhere, and use them in a callback. A dynamic malloc will either cause
> > this to crash, or require complicated checks in the script (or the script
> > loaders).
> >
> > So to keep it 'forward-compatible', perhaps increase the default limit to
> > 100, and allow increasing the limit only when creating a new session. How
> > does that sound?
>
> I think 100 sounds reasonable.
Agreed. I also like the idea of being able to specify it at session
creation time.
Thanks,
Brian
- Re: Ping Packagers, (continued)
- Re: Ping Packagers, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/12/19
- Re: Ping Packagers, Dustin Kirkland, 2009/12/20
- Re: Ping Packagers, Sadrul Habib Chowdhury, 2009/12/21
- Re: Ping Packagers, Dustin Kirkland, 2009/12/22
- Re: Ping Packagers,
Brian Kroth <=
- Re: Ping Packagers, Loïc Minier, 2009/12/22
Re: Ping Packagers, Andrew Schulman, 2009/12/09
Re: Ping Packagers, Miroslav Lichvar, 2009/12/10