Re: [Simulavr-devel] compile problem

[Theodore Roth]

On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, John Regehr wrote:

:) So just to be clear, I should be using the very latest gcc?  I guess it
:) would be pre-3.2?  I ask since I've heard that keeping up with the
:) latest gcc CVS is a good way to get failed compiles and broken
:) compilers.

Yes. Check out the head of the cvs tree. You won't have to do that after
3.2 is released though. Yes, using the cvs stuff can break occasionally,
but it's a necessary evil. I've been using the cvs stuff exclusively for
two months now and haven't had but a few broken builds of avr-gcc which
Marek fixed promptly.

Besides, using the latest cvs tools is the only way to get mega128 support
without some rather massive patching. :-(

:) Ok, thanks.  I use the newer versions since I was getting bitten by some
:) limitations of the older automakes.

;-)

Ted Roth