[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb
From: |
Theodore A. Roth |
Subject: |
Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:51:23 -0700 (PDT) |
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Keith Gudger wrote:
> Ted:
>
> simulavr was segmentation faulting.. But, of course, it was my *fault*.
> I fixed it and now ports E & F work. I've also allowed port sizes of 2,
> 4, 7 & 8 bits. Any reason we shouldn't allow sizes of 1-8 bits?
The 7 and 8 limit was done solely because I had only seen devices with
those numbers. There's no reason not to allow 1-8.
Ted Roth
PS: Sorry I haven't been much help. I'm pretty swamped with the day
job right now.
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: AT43USB devices, (continued)
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: AT43USB devices, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/10/08
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: AT43USB devices, Keith Gudger, 2003/10/09
- [Simulavr-devel] raising signals from gdb, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/10/09
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/10/09
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb, Keith Gudger, 2003/10/09
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/10/09
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb, Keith Gudger, 2003/10/10
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb, Theodore A. Roth, 2003/10/10
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb, Keith Gudger, 2003/10/10
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: raising signals from gdb,
Theodore A. Roth <=