Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavr error

[Michael Hennebry]

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008, Klaus Rudolph wrote:

> Knut Schwichtenberg schrieb:
> > Bill,
> >
> > William Rivet wrote:
> >> I'll just pipe in that I'm currently working on replacing the build
> >> system for simulavrxx with something more sane via CMake...thanks to a
> >> little nudging by Michael Buesch :-)
> > Early this year I tried to build simulavrxx and got it running under
> > Linux with ordinary make and without problems. Make was annoying and did
> > not change for the last 15 years but GNU make is running under cygwin as
> > well as under any *nix. What is the benefit for me as a user of
> > simulavrxx in using CMake?

Trying to use the files that came with
simulavrxx gave me nothing but trouble.
Replacing autotools with something less tricky
than plutonium might be a good thing.

-- 
Michael   address@hidden
"Those parts of the system that you can hit with a hammer (not advised)
are called Hardware;  those program instructions that you can only
curse at are called Software."