[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:59:51 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of Joel Sherrill
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 3:42 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to make sure simulavrxx has all
> the capabilities avrtest and simulavr have.
>
> I am more familiar with avrtest and think
> these are the current deficiencies:
>
> + no maximum run limit
> + no magic "exit" port
> + no magic "abort" port
>
> Are there other issues? I have almost finished
> addressing those.
I think that the magic test to see if everything is covered under avrtest, is
to run the GCC Regression Test for the AVR and there are no differences between
avrtest and simulavrxx.
Eric
- [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/10
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/11
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Joel Sherrill, 2009/03/11
- Re: test result code was Re: [Simulavr-devel] avrtest and simulavr vs simulavrxx, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/03/11