[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?
From: |
Pietro Terna |
Subject: |
Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy? |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Mar 1998 22:55:26 +0100 |
What about substituting binary distributions with a good 'configure,
make,
make install' procedure?
Pietro
Makefile.conf declares:
### Configure this file so Swarm knows about your environment. Some day
###
we will try to use GNU autoconf to do this for you.
:-)
At 10.01 04/03/98 -0600, you wrote:
>Watching all these error messages and cries for help go by concerning the
>versions of the C library and the edition of GCC, I'm wondering if the Swarm
>sources ought to be distributed without the binary stuff and people should be
>encouraged to do achive installs only. IMHO, SFI ought to distribute one
source
>with good install directions and let people compile it themselves. SFI people
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
==================================
- problem compil. apps, Omar Andres Armas Aleman, 1998/03/03
- Re: problem compil. apps, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/03
- Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/04
- My personal criticism, Martin Hinsch, 1998/03/06
- Re: My personal criticism, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/06
- Re: My personal criticism, Omar Andres Armas Aleman, 1998/03/06
- Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?,
Pietro Terna <=
- Re: Archive and Binary Swarm distributions: change strategy?, Marcus G. Daniels, 1998/03/04