[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does dropping objects really free memory?
From: |
famasce |
Subject: |
Re: Does dropping objects really free memory? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:23:44 +0200 |
> It seems possible you have a memory leak. I've got one too. This
> happens when you drop a list without removing the members that need to
> be removed, or if you forget to drop indexes or other things you create.
>
In my simulation I don't use any list or index object,only two arrays (whose
members can't be removed).
> I think also that if, in a zone, you use allocBlock to grab some dynamic
> memory, you have to write a drop method for that class to explicitly
> drop that block.
I don't use it,I simply write newZone =[Zone create: [self getZone]]; is it
wrong?
>
http://www.santafe.edu/projects/swarm/archive/list-archive.9811/0113.html
>
The link to dmalloc are broken.
I also forgot to say I'm using Swarm under Windows NT and CygWin.
I've put the source in
ftp://ftp.santafe.edu/pub/swarm/users-contrib/incoming/
in the hope that someone can help me.
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
Re: Does dropping objects really free memory?, Marcus G. Daniels, 1999/10/19