Re: Clarification on the effect of "DROP" on subobjects.

[Marcus G. Daniels]

>>>>> "PJ" == Paul E Johnson <address@hidden> writes:

PJ> Just being sure, but if this a SwarmObject (not Swarm) , then it
PJ> would still need

PJ> -(void)drop { [objZone drop]; [super drop]; }

PJ> If I'm right, I like this idea and think we should preach it to
PJ> all the faithful.

Yes, that's one way.

In pure Java agents, you don't need to do that because once the agent
is dropped the garbage collector will take care of the rest.

Btw, I've noticed in some Java models people will subclass from SwarmObject.
There's no real need for that; it's better to have pure Java objects.

                  ==================================
   Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
   to day usage of Swarm.  For list administration needs (esp.
   [un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
   with "help" in the body of the message.