Re: [Swftools-common] basic question on ActionScript 2.0

[Pablo Rodríguez]

On 10/30/2013 09:49 AM, Lists wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:50:40 +0100 Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
>> On 10/28/2013 10:49 PM, John Sullivan wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Use .include from the main .sc to incorporate those declarations
>>> into the final SWF.
> 
> That is merely attempted obfuscation of the original time-line data.
> It doesn't exactly resolve the licensing issue.

Do you think it’s obfuscation? I think it’s only separation.

>>> Both the script and the main .sc remain unencumbered, the "end user"
>>> will need to provide their own source data to complete compilation.
>>
>> Thank you very much for this, John (you make my day :-)).
> 
> .. and the source data along with the result of the compilation using
> it, could be considered someone's artistic endeavour.
> 
>> I think this can solve the issue (at least from the perspective of the
>> user).
> 
> Does it?

Maybe (or perhaps) not. I have to analyze this.

But even if it doesn’t solve the problem, I think it would be easier to
write a GPL exception to this.

Cheers,


Pablo
-- 
http://www.ousia.tk