[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Vampire-public] Comments about recent news & some ideas about the f
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: [Vampire-public] Comments about recent news & some ideas about the future |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:01:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Burrus <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi all,
Hi one,
> So what's the point? We would like to share the host informations
> for Olena and Transformers.
Actually, it seems to me that another critical feature would be to
have Vampire probe the machines to set up this configuration file. I
don't trust users for this.
I don't think we need something like the Autoconf machinery, a simple,
robust, and generic parsing of -v, --version, -V etc. should suffice.
> And then, it is up to the tarball configuration file to create
> virtual host classes, corresponding to the specific needs of the
> package to be tested. You may think that it's a pity to have to
> take care about host specific information (software versions, etc.)
> in the tarball configuration file, but I really don't see how to
> avoid it.
I subscribe to this.
I like your plan a lot, but the main issues will be... who will
implement this? Who still has time to devote to Vampire?