Re: [Xlog-discussion] xlog printing bugs

[Joop Stakenborg]

On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:57:07 +0000
Bob Lisbonne <address@hidden> wrote:

> Thank you for going to the trouble of compiling and installing 0.6.1 to 
> investigate. Based on the following, it still appears that I am running 
> 0.6.1, as opposed to 0.6 by mistake.
> 
> address@hidden bob]$ xlog --version
> xlog version 0.6.1
> address@hidden bob]$ which xlog
> /usr/local/bin/xlog
> address@hidden bob]$ /usr/local/bin/xlog --version
> xlog version 0.6.1
> address@hidden bob]$ grep version .xlog/preferences
> version 0.6.1
> 
> Also, the xlog About box says the version is 0.6.1.
> 

Yes, I am convinced. Sorry about that.
I might have found the error. I thought I had fixed the bug, but only partial.
The header on the first page should be okay, but subsequent pages are wrong,
am I right?
If so, replace line 763 in callbacks.c from:

fprintf(fp, "\\textbf{Nr} &\\textbf{Date} &\\textbf{GMT} &\\textbf{Callsign} 
&\\textbf{MHz} &\\textbf{Mode} &\\textbf{TX} &\\textbf{RX} &\\textbf{Remarks} 
&\\textbf{Out} &\\textbf{In}\\\\\n");

To:

fprintf(fp, "\\textbf{Nr} &\\textbf{Date} &\\textbf{GMT} &\\textbf{Callsign} 
&\\textbf{MHz} &\\textbf{Mode} &\\textbf{TX} &\\textbf{RX} &\\textbf{Out} 
&\\textbf{In} &\\textbf{Remarks}\\\\\n");

(please don't breakup the line), and recompile.
If this works, we should try to fix your other bug.

> I am printing to the "letter" paper size, and to a printer (not a file), if 
> that helps.
> 

Should not make any difference.

> thanks,
> --Bob
> 
> 
> 

Joop