Re: waiting for process substitutions

[alex xmb sw ratchev]

imo have multiple $! at once set is to me a hard must , when more are
invoked .. this is a programmical must .. or do only i see these schematics
.. a no is brainless ..
.. in the way not supporting floating math .. so i should not care so much
=pp  =)

On Tue, Aug 6, 2024, 07:19 Oğuz <oguzismailuysal@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, August 6, 2024, Zachary Santer <zsanter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I
> > don't see the benefit over simply waiting for all process
> > substitutions.
> >
>
> The benefit is they're separate from async jobs and don't get in your way.
> `wait' waiting for the last procsub is acceptable, `wait' waiting for a
> procsub that I forgot about and that won't be listed by `jobs' is not.
> Procsubs occupying one slot in the shell's internal list of job statuses is
> acceptable, them filling up that list and causing data loss/oom errors is
> not.
>
>
> --
> Oğuz
>