[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: waiting for process substitutions
From: |
Oğuz |
Subject: |
Re: waiting for process substitutions |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:21:19 +0300 |
On Tuesday, August 6, 2024, Zachary Santer <zsanter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How bash is actually used should guide its development.
Correct. No one waits for procsubs in their scripts or on the command line.
In a script, a child process being a job or not makes no difference,
> from the shell programmer's perspective, unless you've got job control
> on for some reason.
That's not true. `jobs' works even if job control is disabled. `kill'
accepts jobspecs and bash expands the `\j' escape sequence in prompt
strings. So it does make a difference.
> Only as much noise as how many procsubs you expand on the command line.
>
And that's too many. Much more than async jobs.
--
Oğuz
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Oğuz, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Oğuz, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions,
Oğuz <=
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Oğuz, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/07
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/07