[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: waiting for process substitutions
From: |
Oğuz |
Subject: |
Re: waiting for process substitutions |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Aug 2024 22:20:28 +0300 |
On Tuesday, August 6, 2024, Zachary Santer <zsanter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This I guess makes a further point about the need to anticipate what
> shell programmers might want or need to be able to do.
To me it just shows how lost you are, sorry. Perhaps you should consider
other languages, or write a utility that makes setting up FIFOs easier, I
don't know.
--
Oğuz
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, (continued)
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/05
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Oğuz, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, alex xmb sw ratchev, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Oğuz, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Oğuz, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions,
Oğuz <=
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/06
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Chet Ramey, 2024/08/07
- Re: waiting for process substitutions, Zachary Santer, 2024/08/07