[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it n
From: |
tcallawa at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug |
Date: |
11 Oct 2007 14:59:51 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From tcallawa at redhat dot com 2007-10-11 14:59
-------
I'm not sure what you need here.
bash-3.2# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--enable-checking=release --with-system-zlib --enable-__cxa_atexit
--disable-libunwind-exceptions
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,java,fortran --enable-java-awt=gtk
--disable-dssi --enable-plugin
--with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-1.5.0.0/jre
--enable-libgcj-multifile --enable-java-maintainer-mode
--with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --with-long-double-128
--host=sparc64-redhat-linux --build=sparc64-redhat-linux
--target=sparc64-redhat-linux --with-cpu=v7
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20070821 (Red Hat 4.1.2-25)
I can give you remote access to this system if it would make things easier, just
drop me an email.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/5149] New: PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/09
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug,
tcallawa at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/11
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/15
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/22