[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it n
From: |
oliver at linux-kernel dot at |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug |
Date: |
22 Oct 2007 08:10:26 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-22
08:10 -------
OK, then this should be what you need, right?
address@hidden ~]$ tar tfvj elfutils-system-linker-input-files.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r--
root/root 1496 2007-07-31 23:10 usr/lib/crti.o
-rw-r--r-- root/root 3560 2007-09-29 21:41
usr/lib/gcc/alpha-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtbeginS.o
-rw-r--r-- root/root 140288 2007-09-29 21:57
usr/lib/gcc/alpha-redhat-linux/4.1.2/libgcc.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-10-11 12:37
usr/lib/gcc/alpha-redhat-linux/4.1.2/libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
-rw-r--r-- root/root 241 2007-07-31 20:40 usr/lib/libc.so
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-08-03 22:36 lib/libc.so.6.1 -> libc-2.6.so
-rw-r--r-- root/root 20430 2007-08-01 02:20 usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-08-03 22:36 lib/ld-linux.so.2 -> ld-2.6.so
-rw-r--r-- root/root 140288 2007-09-29 21:57
usr/lib/gcc/alpha-redhat-linux/4.1.2/libgcc.a
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-10-11 12:37
usr/lib/gcc/alpha-redhat-linux/4.1.2/libgcc_s.so -> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1
-rw-r--r-- root/root 2056 2007-09-29 21:41
usr/lib/gcc/alpha-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtendS.o
-rw-r--r-- root/root 792 2007-07-31 23:10 usr/lib/crtn.o
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-10-11 12:32 lib/libgcc_s.so.1 ->
libgcc_s-4.1.2-20070925.so.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 1906056 2007-08-01 02:10 lib/libc-2.6.so
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 160384 2007-08-01 02:10 lib/ld-2.6.so
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2007-10-11 12:32 lib/libgcc_s.so.1 ->
libgcc_s-4.1.2-20070925.so.1
-rwxr-xr-x root/root 65448 2007-09-29 21:57 lib/libgcc_s-4.1.2-20070925.so.1
address@hidden ~]$ tar tfvj elfutils-system-linker-input-files.tar.bz2
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, (continued)
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/11
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/11
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/15
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug,
oliver at linux-kernel dot at <=
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/23
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/23
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/23
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/23
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/23
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/23
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/31