[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it n
From: |
oliver at linux-kernel dot at |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug |
Date: |
16 Oct 2007 09:13:08 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-16
09:13 -------
With latest and greatest elfutils it has gone worse:
<snip>
loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable
*** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so
FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh
</snip>
<snip>
--- readelf.out 2007-10-16 11:00:54.000000000 +0200
+++ - 2007-10-16 11:00:54.118131000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
Hex dump of section [6] '.strtab', 1 bytes at offset 0x290:
- 0x00000000 00 .
+ 0x00000000 00 .
FAIL: run-readelf-test2.sh
</snip>
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, (continued)
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/11
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/11
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/15
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug,
oliver at linux-kernel dot at <=
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/23