[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it n
|
From: |
hjl at lucon dot org |
|
Subject: |
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug |
|
Date: |
16 Oct 2007 16:06:51 -0000 |
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-16 16:06 -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > *** Bug 5176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> Oh well. My alpha bug is really the same as this sparc bug. :-)
> If anyone needs any input, let me know!
I need ALL linker input from Linux/alpha.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, (continued)
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/10
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, tcallawa at redhat dot com, 2007/10/11
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/11
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/15
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/16
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug,
hjl at lucon dot org <=
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/17
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/22
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, oliver at linux-kernel dot at, 2007/10/23
- [Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug, hjl at lucon dot org, 2007/10/23