[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Aug 2006 13:31:37 -0500 |
> However, on MinGW all three tests fail because the program outputs CRLF
> line endings, while the test suite creates files with LF ending.
Um, why? That is, why does cat>foo produce LF files while hello>foo
produces CRLF files?
Is this different in MinGW than under Cygwin? (I'm probably just dumb,
but I cannot infer this behavior from
http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-textbinary.html.)
Can we easily get cat>foo (or some equivalent) to produce CRLF files?
That seems like it would be a tiny bit cleaner to me than deleting the
\r from the hello>foo output.
Thanks,
karl
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Karl Berry, 2006/08/23
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Karl Berry, 2006/08/24
- Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/25
- Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Karl Berry, 2006/08/25
- Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/25
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF,
Karl Berry <=
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/08/29
Re: hello-2.1.91 and CR/LF, Karl Berry, 2006/08/29
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/24
Re: hello-2.1.91 build failure on MacOS X, Karl Berry, 2006/08/24
hello-2.1.91 testsuite failure, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/22
hello-2.1.91: tweak tests, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/22
hello-2.1.91: no skip test, Bruno Haible, 2006/08/22