[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?
From: |
Paul Fisher |
Subject: |
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 15:51:44 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) |
Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> writes:
> I was not aware that the license of the awt classes should have been
> changed from LGPL to GPL.
The AWT classes are GPL'd. New licensing headers need to be checked
into CVS. If someone could go ahead and do this, that would be a
help. I haven't had time to do so.
> Note that GCC 3.0.x ships with a partial AWT implementation under
> GPL+exception.
The AWT files that are part of the GCC release are GPL'd. The
licensing information at the top of such files is incorrect.
> And the just announced Wonka class libraries seem to come
> with a complete AWT under a BSD+trademark style license.
I'll have to look at this.
- java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?,
Paul Fisher <=
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Paul Fisher, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Brian Jones, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Per Bothner, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Tom Tromey, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Tom Tromey, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Chris Gray, 2001/10/31
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Chris Gray, 2001/10/31
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/31