[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 02:53:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
Dear Paul,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:12:28PM -0800, Paul Fisher wrote:
>
> Sorry for not going into great detail, but I have a plane to catch
> (literally). I'll comment more when I have some free time.
Please do when you have time.
I don't have a very good feeling about this and I hope you can take that
bad feeling away. I don't mind if this is actually a good decission for
the GNU project as a whole, but in that case I really have to see more
explanation of why this is a good move. I am very pessimistic about targeting
our GPLed library against a free beer library from Sun. I don't think this
will create more Free Software or cooperation between different free software
projects at the moment. There are a lot of Free JVMs that are currently
using or are trying to use a version of GNU Classpath as their standard
library implementation. I hope that switching to GPL for an (essential)
part of the library does not effect that.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Stuff to read:
<http://www.toad.com/gnu/whatswrong.html>
What's Wrong with Copy Protection, by John Gilmore
- java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Tom Tromey, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Chris Gray, 2001/10/31
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Chris Gray, 2001/10/31
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/31
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Tom Tromey, 2001/10/30
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Brian Jones, 2001/10/29