[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL? |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 00:45:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 05:42:21PM +0100, Chris Gray wrote:
> (Following-up to my own post is a sign of what?)
Greatness :)
My reponse to your last email would have been: "Thank you very much about
being so clear and honest with us about what is going on. Don't worry that
I will actually start hacking on your code base until it is GPL compatible
since I don't really like hacking on code that cannot be used in GPLed
programs". But now that excuse is gone!
It would be great if our management (read RMS) acted so fast :)
I will still wait a bit on the outcome of the negotiation that Per Bothner
is doing. But you can be sure that I will seriously look into Rudolph now.
Thanks,
Mark
--
Stuff to read:
<http://www.toad.com/gnu/whatswrong.html>
What's Wrong with Copy Protection, by John Gilmore
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, (continued)
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Paul Fisher, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Paul Fisher, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Mark Wielaard, 2001/10/29
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Brian Jones, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Per Bothner, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Tom Tromey, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Tom Tromey, 2001/10/30
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Chris Gray, 2001/10/31
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Chris Gray, 2001/10/31
- Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?,
Mark Wielaard <=
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Tom Tromey, 2001/10/30
Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?, Brian Jones, 2001/10/29