Re: java.awt status LGPL -> GPL?

[Chris Gray]

(Following-up to my own post is a sign of what?)

Chris Gray wrote:

> Secondly, although I responded positively to Mark's suggestions regarding
> GPL-compatibility, it is still possible that our management would decide
> that
> protecting our trademark is more important, and that it is essential to have
> the
> trademark clause -in- the licence, not next to it.  IANAL, TINLA, etc..

O.K., I've hoofed it from desk to desk and Clause 4 is now gone.  The only
diff between our licence and revised BSD now is a request (-not- a requirement)

to submit any improvements or extensions and to grant ACUNIA NV the rights to
redistribute these changes.  So I guess we're now GPL compatible.

Regards

Chris Gray
VM Architect, ACUNIA