[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Jeff Clough |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:23:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.95 (gnu/linux) |
It seems I've lost track of this conversation. Is this a purely
hypothetical discussion, or is it to be expected that some relatively
near future version of Emacs will be Guile-based?
For what it's worth, as someone who's used Emacs for years but only got
into Lisp a couple of months ago...
I can see this as a good thing for people who'd like a more "modern"
Lisp with their Emacs (and a consistent, "core" extension language
across GNU), but a bad thing for people relying on a large, complex
application maintained by a single busy guy.
Emacs Lisp supports such a grow-it-as-you-need-it development approach
that a lot of stuff out there was built a few lines at a time over
months or years. Expecting the author of an application like that to
carve out a chunk of time for a complete re-write might be asking too
much.
Jeff
- Re: Guile in Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, immanuel litzroth, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs,
Jeff Clough <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen Eilert, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Helmut Eller, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Leo, 2010/04/15