[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:47:13 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
David> Scheme is a smaller starting point than Common Lisp.
But we aren't talking about "Scheme", we're talking about Guile, which
is significantly larger. It has modules and OO and all kinds of other
stuff.
While I rather like CL, and much prefer it to Scheme, I don't see why we
need to consider either. I don't see much wrong with elisp as it is.
In my view it simply is not among the major limiting factors of Emacs.
Tom
- Re: Guile in Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen Eilert, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Helmut Eller, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs,
Tom Tromey <=
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Leo, 2010/04/15