[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:11:40 +0900 |
Jeff Clough writes:
> Expecting the author of an application like that to carve out a
> chunk of time for a complete re-write might be asking too much.
Mike Sperber supervised a student at U. Tuebingen who wrote a
proof-of-concept Emacs Lisp system in Scheme48, with quite reasonable
performance characteristics for a student project. His estimate was
that performance equivalent to existing bytecode of the time was
achievable with reasonable effort.
- Re: Guile in Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, immanuel litzroth, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen Eilert, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Helmut Eller, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Leo, 2010/04/15