[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Ken Raeburn |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:02:50 -0400 |
On Apr 14, 2010, at 14:29, Tom Tromey wrote:
> FWIW, there was once an elisp JIT compiler.
> It was rejected:
Interesting! I'd wondered if there'd be anything to gain from doing that, but
stopped short of actually trying it myself. I'm glad to see someone else has
tried it, even if the conclusion from the experiment was that it wasn't worth
folding in. Actually, I'd been thinking about converting byte-code to C,
changing stack slots to register variables, that sort of thing, and turning
GCC's optimizer loose on it, but I doubt it'd perform all that much better than
the JIT version if the primitives were dominating.
Thanks for the links!
Ken
- Re: Guile in Emacs, (continued)
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Helmut Eller, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, immanuel litzroth, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, christian.lynbech, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs,
Ken Raeburn <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Jeff Clough, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Stephen Eilert, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Helmut Eller, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Tom Tromey, 2010/04/14
- RE: Guile in Emacs, Drew Adams, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David De La Harpe Golden, 2010/04/14
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Leo, 2010/04/15