Re: Towards a cleaner build

[Stefan Monnier]

> Let's see...  Oh, right.  `with-no-warnings' is a function, while I
> thought it would make sense for `with-suppressed-warnings' to be a macro
> since the WARNINGS are supposed to be unevaluated.

Yes, a macro makes sense.

> But as a macro that expands to (basically) `progn', then the byte
> compiler just sees the `progn' and is unable to do anything with the
> form.

You can use byte-compile-macro-environment to override the default
definition of the macro during compilation.


        Stefan