[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a cleaner build
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a cleaner build |
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2019 07:18:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Note that if a function/variable FOO is defined as obsolete in file BAR, then
> I think we'd ideally want to silence all warnings for uses of FOO made
> within BAR.
But I'm not quite sure this is ideal -- someone may well mark something
as obsolete in BAR, and then meant to fix the call sites for FOO
throughout BAR, and then it'd be useful to get the byte compiler to tell
you where the problematic calls are.
So I think this would suppress too many useful warnings, whereas
suppressing warnings about obsolete functions calling each other is much
less problematic.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, (continued)
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/29
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Noam Postavsky, 2019/05/28
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/28
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/29
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/29
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/29
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/28
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/18
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/18
- Re: Towards a cleaner build,
Lars Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/05/17
- Re: Towards a cleaner build, Stefan Monnier, 2019/05/17
RE: Towards a cleaner build, Drew Adams, 2019/05/16
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/16
Re: Towards a cleaner build, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/05/16