[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Aug 2023 17:43:23 +0000 |
Juan Manuel Macías <maciaschain@posteo.net> writes:
>> Why not simply
>>
>> #+begin_anonsection
>> ...
>> #+end_anonsection
>>
>> ?
> ... The problem is the LaTeX side. Since there is no
> support for anonymous sections in LaTeX (I seem to remember that some
> special class like Koma had some command to introduce anonymous breaks,
> but I only use the standard classes), I had to define an environment. It
> is not inconvenient, since after all what appears in LaTeX is the
> typographical result. For the Org side I can use TODO keywords, tags,
> deadlines, etc.
In other words, it is not the section itself, but other
headline/inlinetask features, like todo keywords, tags, planning. Right?
Custom blocks can be exported to anything (not necessarily
\begin{foo}...), similar to how you did custom export for inlinetasks.
There was also an idea to make custom block export more customizeable,
similar to link. Like what
https://github.com/alhassy/org-special-block-extras does.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: [POLL] Should we accept breaking changes to get rid of Org libraries that perform side effects when loading?, (continued)
- [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks (was: [POLL] Should we accept breaking changes to get rid of Org libraries that perform side effects when loading?), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/25
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/25
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/27
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Juan Manuel Macías, 2023/08/27
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/08/31
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/26
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/29
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Alain . Cochard, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Alain . Cochard, 2023/08/30
- Re: [DISCUSSION] Re-design of inlinetasks, Russell Adams, 2023/08/30