|
From: | Max Nikulin |
Subject: | Re: [patch] ox-latex.el: Add `LATEX_PRE_HEADER' keyword |
Date: | Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:38:21 +0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 |
On 28/09/2023 19:31, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
I think I should insist on what I said in my previous message, with a copy/paste: The thing is that here it is not a question of whether something can be done in this way or in another better way. This is how a given package recommends doing it. If the user wants to use that specific package, she/he will have to follow these instructions.
My reading of these instructions: users have 2 options, they either provide .xmpdata files directly or they ask LaTeX to generate it using filecontents* and take responsibility to remove the file when they change metadata.
I do not see any words discouraging the former way, while there are warnings concerning pitfalls with the latter approach that still may be convenient in some cases.
It's more. I am thinking, for example, of the case in which the user has to obtain a * tex file, not a PDF, because she/he is collaborating with more people who do not use Org, but do use that code in the * tex document.
Perhaps I am wrong in my assumption that in particular case of PDF-X compliant documents, it is unlikely that it is just a single .tex document. If there are more files: graphics, custom packages, included .tex file then an additional separate .xmpdata file is not an issue.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |