[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The org--math-p advice around texmathp
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: The org--math-p advice around texmathp |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:14:42 +0000 |
Tony Zorman <tony.zorman@tu-dresden.de> writes:
>> Because Org mode syntax is not LaTeX and `texmathp' assumes that we are
>> inside
>> LaTeX buffer. So, we first check using Org syntax whether the point is
>> inside latex fragment in Org sense.
>
> But isn't what Org calls LaTeX math pretty equivalent to what would
> count as the same in a LaTeX buffer? From a quick scan of texmathp.el, I
> couldn't actually see a hard-dependency on a TeX-derived mode at all. I
> wouldn't really care about this so much, but the fact that the Org
> variant just misreports the position is a bit unfortunate, in my
> opinion.
No, there is a difference.
For example, something like \alpha is a valid Org mode entity.
Without `org--math-p' advice, if you do "`a" in Org buffer with
org-cdlatex-mode, you will see $\alpha$ inserted. With the advice, just
\alpha will be inserted.
There are likely other similar edge cases.
We would not choose to advice third-party function without a strong
reason.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>